LUMINOUS VENTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(1), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1038/MUM/2025Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 March 2025AY 2008-09Bench: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\n&\nMS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER\nI.T.A. No. 1038 & 1039/Mum/2025\nAssessment Year: 2008-09 & 2009-10\nLuminous Venture Private Limited\nC-402, Fortune Towers\nMadhapur Main Road\nMadhapur\nDist. Hyderabad\nTelangana- 500081\n[PAN: AABCL3826F]\nअपीलार्थी/ (Appellant)\nVs\nDy. Commissioner of\nIncome Tax, Central Circle-\n4(1), Mumbai\nप्रत्यर्थी/ (Respondent)\nAssessee by : Shri Ashok Bansal, A/R\nRevenue by : Shri Ra3 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, HONBLE & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, HONBLE

For Appellant: Shri Ashok Bansal, A/R
For Respondent: Shri Ram Krishn Kedia, Sr. D/R
Hearing: 25/03/2025Pronounced: 25/03/2025

ORDER \nPER NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, AM:\nI.T.A. No. 1038 & 1039/Mum/2025 are two separate appeals by\nthe assessee preferred against two separate orders of the ld. CIT(A)-\n52, Mumbai [hereinafter “the ld. CIT(A)"], pertaining to AY 2008-09 &\n2009-10.\n2.\nBoth these appeals were heard together and are disposed off by\nthis common order for the sake of convenience and brevity.\n3.\nIn AY 2008-09, we have\ncarefully perused the order of the ld. CIT(A). We find that the appeal\nof the assessee was dismissed for want of assessment order. In our\nconsidered opinion, the ld. CIT(A) ought to have given sufficient\nopportunity to the assessee to furnish copy of the assessment order\nalong with related documents and should have decided the appeal on\nmerits of the case. Therefore, we direct the ld. CIT(A) to decide the\nappeal afresh on merits of the case and assessee is directed to furnish\nthe assessment order and related documents.\n4.\nIn pertaining to AY 2009-10, we again\nfind that the assessee has raised an additional ground extracted at para\n3.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →