SHIV SHAKTI EDUCATIONAL TRUST,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appellant was not given sufficient opportunity to submit documents and that the Trust is genuine and imparting education. A lenient view was taken, and the matter was remitted back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Shiv Shakti Educational Trust, filed an application for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application for non-furnishing of necessary documents despite notices and reminders, citing technicalities.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of registration under Section 12AB by the CIT(E) was justified due to non-compliance with document submission requirements, and whether the appellant was provided sufficient opportunity.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “C” Bench, Mumbai.
Before: Smt. Beena Pillai (JM) & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara (AM)
2 Shiv Shakti Educational Trust trust's educational activities, and rejected the 12A application on the technicality of not submitting the documents. Relief Prayed 1. To restore the matter back to the CIT (Exemptions), Mumbai 2. To stay the Order of CIT (Exemptions), Mumbai till a fresh order is passed
From the above, it is seen that Ld. CIT(E) has rejected the application for grant of registration under section 12AB of the I.T. Act because necessary documents required to be accompanied the application in Form No. 10AB were not furnished. Hence, a notice issued to the appellant by Ld. CIT(E) and two more reminders were also sent to the above trust. However, appellant failed to reply to any of the above mentioned notices. As the appellant has not made any compliance to the notices issued by the Revenue, Ld. CIT(E) held that he is unable to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion as to whether appellant trust fulfills all the conditions to get registration u/s. 12AB of the Act and hence application was rejected.
Aggrieved by the order of Ld. CIT(E), appeal was filed by the appellant trust before the ITAT.
Ld. AR of the appellant has argued that the trust is a small one and there was no full-fledged accounting staff to look after the income tax matters and hence appellant trust could not furnish all required details to Ld. CIT(E). But, it was stated that they have all required details and the trust is a genuine and it is an existence for several years and the activities are going on as per the objects of the Trust. The Returns of Income of the trust were also being filed regularly and there was never any objection from any Department. Hence, it was pleaded that one more opportunity may be given to the appellant trust to furnish all particulars alongwith necessary details required by Ld. CIT(E). It was also stated by Ld. AR of the appellant that no further adjournment would be taken and all notices would be complied with.
3 Shiv Shakti Educational Trust 4. Ld. DR relied on the order of Ld. CIT(E) and has stated that Ld. CIT(E) has correctly denied the registration for the reasons mentioned in that order.
After hearing rival submissions, it is decided that one more opportunity is being given to the appellant to file all particulars and necessary evidences required before Ld. CIT(E). Moreover, appellant trust is filing returns of income regularly, a lenient view is being taken. The issue is remitted back to the file of Ld. CIT(E). The appellant trust is directed to furnish all details without further adjournment and cooperative with the Department.
The appeal of the appellant is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 26/03/2025.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026