M/S AKTIEBOLAGET SKF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1(1)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had submitted that the appeal be treated as withdrawn due to the application filed under the DTVSV scheme. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the final order of assessment. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas Scheme, 2024, which was processed and a certificate was issued.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee should be dismissed as withdrawn in light of the application filed under the Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas Scheme, 2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM &
Appellant /Assessee by : Shri Apurva Chaudhary, AR : Shri Vivek Perampurna, CIT-DR Revenue / Respondent by : 25.03.2025 Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement : 28.03.2025 O R D E R
Per Padmavathy S, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is against the final order of assessment passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (T)-Circle-1(1)(1), Mumbai under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C)13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) dated 25.10.2023 for AY 2021-22.
We heard the parties. The assessee vide letter dated 29.01.2025 submitted that the assessee has filed under the aegis of the Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas
2 ITA 4649/Mum/2023 M/s Aktiebolaget SKF Scheme, 2024 (DTVSV) an application in Form No.1 and that the application has been processed culminating in the issue of certificate dated 17.01.2025 in Form No.2. The assessee accordingly submitted that the appeal filed by the assessee shall be treated as withdrawn. In the light of the above submissions, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the assessee to revive the appeal in the event of the application filed under DTVSV does not go through. Hence the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026