ATASI OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -5 , MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed that the appeal filed by the assessee be dismissed as withdrawn, and consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal challenging an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee later intended to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee, which was sought to be withdrawn, should be dismissed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI
(Assessment Year: 2018-19) Atasi Overseas Private Limited Principal Commissioner Of 209, Modi Chamber, 2nd Floor, Opera Income Tax -5, Mumbai Room No. 515, 5th Floor, Aayakar House Police Station, V. P. Road, Vs. Mumbai – 400004 Bhavan, Maharishi Karve Road, Mumbai – 400020. PAN/GIR No. AAACA4461C (Appellant) : (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri. Om Kandalkar Respondent by : Shri. Shekhar L. Gajbhiye, CIT DR. Date of Hearing : 23.04.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 23.04.2025 O R D E R Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M: This appeal has been filed by the assessee, challenging the order of the learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax PCIT, Mumbai - 5 (‘ld. PCIT’ for short), National Faceless Appeal Centre (‘NFAC’ for short) passed u/s.263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act'), pertaining to the Assessment Year (‘A.Y.’ for short) 2018-19.
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: ”
1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as "Ld. PCIT") has passed the impugned order dated 04.02.2025 under section 263 of the Act without accepting the Appellant's prayer to set aside the assessment order and direct the Assessing Officer to make fresh assessment after considering the submissions of the Appellant. Thus, the directions given in the impugned order dated 04.02.2025 passed under section 263 of the Act are not justified.”
(A.Y. 2018 -19) Atasi Overseas Private Limited 3. The assessee intends to withdraw the present appeal and had made a written submission dated 22.04.2025 to that effect. 4. The learned Departmental Representative (ld. DR for short) for the Revenue had nothing to controvert the same. 5. We hereby direct that the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed Order pronounced in the open court on 23.04.2025
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026