KENNY DCOSTA,ISRAEL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , NARIMAN POINT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “K” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT () & SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN () Assessment Year: 2015-16
PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM This appeal has been filed in prescribed form No. 36 against the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer in terms of section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short „the Act‟) for assessment year 2015-16, pursuant to the direction of Ld. Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) dated 17.10.2024. Kenny Dcosta 2 2. At the outset, it is observed from the record that the form No. 36 i.e. form prescribed for filing appeal to ITAT, filed by the assessee is neither signed nor verified on behalf of the assessee. In this regard, a defect notice was issued to the assessee, but said defect has not been removed. Also despite notifying, none appeared for the hearing dated 14.05.2025. The notices sent for intimating defect as well as notice sent for the hearing dated 14.05.2025 have returned back with the comment of the postal authorities as “address not known”. The unsigned and unverified form of appeal cannot be treated as valid form of appeal. In view of the aforesaid, this appeal filed by the assessee is rejected in-limine with liberty to the assessee to file another appeal in accordance with provision of law, if so advised. 3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is rejected as un- admitted. Order pronounced by way of display on notice board under Rule 34(4) of ITAT Rules, 1963 on 19/05/2025. (RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated: 19/05/2025 Rahul Sharma, Sr. P.S.
Copy of the Order forwarded to :
The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. CIT
Kenny Dcosta
3
4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai
5. Guard file.
BY ORDER,
////
(