CLINICALDERMATOLOGY CONCLAVE FOUNDATION,KOTA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), CIT (EXEMPTION) JAIPUR

ITA 726/JPR/2026Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 September 2026AY 2026-275 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, “A” BENCH, JAIPUR

Hearing: 23.09.2026Pronounced: 28.09.2026

Per Annapurna Gupta, AM:- The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the CIT Exemption Jaipur(hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(E)”), dated 04.02.2026 rejecting assessee’s application

P a g e | 2 Clinical Dermatology Conclave Foundation seeking registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) .

2.

A perusal of the order passed by the ld. CIT(E) reveals that the application was rejected ex parte after giving only two notices of hearing to the assessee, both of which remained uncompiled with,the application being rejected for the reason that the assessee had mentioned incorrect clause under

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.