KAUSHAL PRAVINKUMAR SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AHMEDABAD
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH
Before: Shri Rahul Chaudhary & Shri R. Govindarajan
PER R. GOVINDARAJAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee has filed the appeal against the order dated 27-02-2026 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre NFAC, Delhi (in short, referred to as the CIT(A)) u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein referred to as “the Act”) relating to Assessment Year 2023-24. I.T.A No. 2356/Ahd/2026 Kaushal Pravinkuamr Shah, A.Y. 2023-24
The assessee raised the following grounds of appeal:- “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, has erred in law and on facts in confirming the assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with section 144B
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.