← Back to search

PRAFUL ARJUN RANE ,MUMBAI vs. ITO INT TAX WARD 4(1)(1), MUMBAI

PDF
ITA 6943/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 September 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “I”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV & SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHANPraful Arjun Rane F 801, Dheeraj Presidency, M. G. Road, Sansruti Bhavan, Kandivali West, Mubmai-400 067 PAN: AGXPR2983E Vs. ITO Int. Tax Ward 4(1)(1) Kautilya Bhavan, NKC Bandra East, Mumbai-400 051

Pronounced: 12.09.2025

PER RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN (J.M.): 1. The appeal filed by the appellant/assessee against the assessment order passed by Ld. AO on 18.03.2024 in pursuant to the direction given by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (DRP-2), Mumbai [Ld. CIT(A)], Mumbai dated 02.12.2024 passed u/s. 144C(5) of the Act for AY 2015-16. Praful Arjun Rane 2. At the outset, our attention was drawn towards letter dated 08.09.2025 wherein the assessee has requested to withdraw the appeal. The operative portion of the letter extracted as under:- “Sub: Appeal No.- ITA 6943/MUM/2024-PAN: AGXPR2983E AY: 2015-16 Personal hearing dt.11/09/2025. 1. With reference to above, please note that this Appeal was physically filed on JL.17/02/2025 and also filed online.on dt. 10/01/2025 Appeal No.1046/MUM/2025. Therefore there is duplication of same appeal. 2. Kindly, note that Appeal no.1046/MUM/2025. A.Y 2015-16 for same ground is already heard by ITAT Bench-1 on dt.12.08.2025 and order is awaited any day. Therefore, present Appeal before your honor bearing No. ITA 6943/MUM/2024 needs to be withdrawn, Kindly do the needful and oblige.” 3. On the other hand, Ld. DR did not object to the said request of withdrawal. 4. Considering the contents of the letter as mentioned above, we allow the request of the assessee for withdrawing the present appeal. 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Praful Arjun Rane Order pronounced in the open court on 12.09.2025 (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Mumbai / Dated 12.09.2025 Dhananjay, Sr.PS

Copy of the Order forwarded to:

1.

The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard file. //// BY ORDER

(Asstt.

PRAFUL ARJUN RANE ,MUMBAI vs ITO INT TAX WARD 4(1)(1), MUMBAI | BharatTax