DAWOODI BOHRA JAMAT,PALGHAR vs. CIT EXEMPTION PUNE, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2637/MUM/2026Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 July 2026AY 2026-277 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee was not given a fair opportunity to present its case as the show cause notice was sent to a former manager's email. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a religious trust, applied for regular registration under section 12AB after its provisional registration was cancelled. The CIT(E) rejected the application, citing lack of evidence for the genuineness of activities and concerns about the trust's objects benefiting a specific community.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee was denied a fair opportunity to present its case due to improper service of the show cause notice, and whether the CIT(E) properly assessed the genuineness of the trust's activities and its objects.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH

For Respondent: Shri Sandeep Lakra, CIT DR
Hearing: 07/07/2026Pronounced: 07/07/2026

आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 10.12.2024 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whereby the application filed by the assessee in Form No.10AB seeking regular registration under

2 ITA No. 2637/Mum/2026 Dawoodi Bohra Jamat section 12AB has been rejected and the provisional registration earlier granted to the assessee has also been cancelled.

2.

Briefly stated, the facts are that the assessee is a religious trust constituted in the year 1953 and registered under the provisions of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act. The assessee was granted provisional registration under section 12AB vide Form No.10AC with effect from 27.05.2021. Upon expiry of the provisional registration, the assessee filed an application in Form No.10AB on 04.06.2024 seeking regular registration under section 12AB. During the course of proceedings, the learned CIT(E) issued a notice dated 13.07.2024 calling upon the assessee to furnish various details relating to its objects, activities and compliance with the statutory requirements contemplated under section 12AB. On the request of the assessee, the hearing was adjourned and another notice dated 30.07.2024 was issued fixing the hearing on 08.08.2024. Thereafter, a detailed show cause notice dated 23.11.2024 was issued pointing out certain deficiencies and requiring the assessee to explain as to why the application should not be rejected. Ultimately, vide order dated 10.12.2024, the learned CIT(E) rejected the application under section 12AB and also cancelled the provisional registration earlier granted to the assessee.

3.

From the impugned order, we find that the learned CIT(E) has recorded that despite sufficient opportunities, the assessee

3 ITA No. 2637/Mum/2026 Dawoodi Bohra Jamat failed to establish the genuineness of its activities by furnishing complete details and supporting documentary evidence. According to the learned CIT(E), the assessee had not furnished a proper note describing the activities actually undertaken along with the dates and places of such activities, particulars of the beneficiaries and the manner in which they were identified. It was further observed that no supporting material such as bills, invoices, expenditure vouchers, photographs, newspaper cuttings or any other credible evidence had been furnished to substantiate the genuineness of the activities claimed to have been carried out by the trust. Besides the above, the learned CIT(E) also observed that the objects of the trust, prima facie, appeared to be intended for the benefit of a particular religious community and not for the benefit of the public at large. Since no explanation was furnished by the assessee to the show cause notice nor were the deficiencies pointed out therein removed, the learned CIT(E) concluded that he was unable to arrive at a satisfactory satisfaction regarding the genuineness of the activities and compliance with the statutory requirements contemplated under section 12AB and accordingly rejected the application while simultaneously cancelling the provisional registration granted to the assessee.

4.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite service of notice. We have, therefore, proceeded to dispose of the appeal ex parte qua the assessee after hearing the learned Departmental Representative and upon careful examination of the material

4 ITA No. 2637/Mum/2026 Dawoodi Bohra Jamat available on record, including the grounds of appeal and the statement of facts accompanying the memorandum of appeal.

5.

We have carefully considered the impugned order and the material available on record. From the statement of facts accompanying the appeal, it is noticed that the assessee has specifically pleaded that the show cause notice dated 23.11.2024 was sent to the email address of the former manager of the trust, who had already ceased to be associated with its affairs. Consequently, according to the assessee, the trustees remained unaware of the issuance of the said show cause notice and were, therefore, deprived of the opportunity of furnishing the requisite explanation and the supporting documentary evidence regarding the activities of the trust. It has also been stated that the trust possesses all the relevant records relating to its activities, beneficiaries and supporting evidences, which could not be produced before the learned CIT(E) because the show cause notice had never come to the knowledge of the trustees.

6.

There can be no dispute that while examining an application under section 12AB, the learned CIT(E) is required to satisfy himself regarding the objects of the trust, the genuineness of its activities and compliance with such statutory requirements as are relevant for achieving its objects. Thus, the deficiencies noted by the learned CIT(E) in the impugned order undoubtedly fall within the scope of enquiry contemplated under section

5 ITA No. 2637/Mum/2026 Dawoodi Bohra Jamat 12AB. However, the satisfaction required to be recorded under the said provision must necessarily be arrived at after affording the applicant a fair, effective and meaningful opportunity of meeting the observations contained in the show cause notice. Rejection of registration under section 12AB has serious civil consequences and directly affects the entitlement of a trust to claim exemption under the Act. Therefore, adherence to the principles of natural justice assumes paramount importance before an adverse order is passed.

7.

Considering the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the specific plea raised by the assessee that the show cause notice dated 23.11.2024 had been transmitted to the email address of the former manager and consequently did not come to the knowledge of the trustees, we are of the considered opinion that the matter deserves to be restored to the file of the learned CIT(E). The impugned order primarily proceeds on the absence of supporting evidence regarding the genuineness of the activities of the trust and also on the interpretation of the objects contained in the trust deed. Both these aspects require proper factual examination after considering the relevant documents, evidences and explanations which the assessee may produce before the learned CIT(E). In our considered view, the interest of substantial justice would be better served if one effective opportunity is granted to the assessee to place all the relevant material before the learned CIT(E.) Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the

6 ITA No. 2637/Mum/2026 Dawoodi Bohra Jamat merits of the controversy or on the correctness of the observations recorded in the impugned order, we deem it appropriate to set aside the impugned order and restore the entire matter to the file of the learned CIT(E) for adjudication afresh in accordance with law. The learned CIT(E) shall examine all the evidences and explanations that may be furnished by the assessee, consider the issue regarding the objects as well as the genuineness of the activities in accordance with law and thereafter pass a speaking order after affording adequate and effective opportunity of hearing. The assessee shall also extend full cooperation in the proceedings and furnish all the requisite documents and evidences as may be called for by the learned CIT(E), without seeking unnecessary adjournments.

8.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 7th July, 2026.

Sd/- Sd/- (ARUN KHODPIA) (AMIT SHUKLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 07/07/2026 KARUNA, sr.ps

7 ITA No. 2637/Mum/2026 Dawoodi Bohra Jamat Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard file. //True Copy//

BY ORDER,

(Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →