KARANDEEP SINGH,HARYANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HARYANA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 791/CHANDI/2026Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh08 July 2026AY 2012-132 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, subject to the assessee paying a cost of Rs. 5,000/-. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment, allowing the assessee to prove the source of the cash deposits.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed against an assessment order that added cash deposits of Rs. 32.03 Lacs due to lack of substantiation. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition. There was a significant delay in filing the appeal before the ITAT.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned and if the assessee should be given an opportunity to substantiate the cash deposits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, CHANDIGARH

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, CHANDIGARH PHYSICAL HEARING HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA No.791/CHANDI/2026 (िनधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Shri Karandeep Singh ITO Jagadhri Workshop, Village Sasauli बनाम/ Vs. Aaykar Bhawan, Yamunanagar Yamunanagar, Haryana – 135002 Haryana – 135001 �ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. BGWPS-3950-G (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��थ� / Respondent) : अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Sh. Ajay Jain (CA) – Ld. AR ��थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Sh. Vivek Vardhan (Addl. CIT) - Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 08-07-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement 09-07-2026 : आदेश / O R D E R 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2012- 13 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC [CIT(A)] dated 19.01.2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] on best judgment basis u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 11.12.2019. In the assessment order, Ld. AO made addition of cash deposit for Rs.32.03 Lacs for want of any substantive representation from the assessee. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the assessment for the same very reasons. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before Tribunal. The registry has noted delay of 729 days in the appeal, the condonation of

which has been sought by Ld. AR on the strength of condonation petition which is accompanied by an affidavit of the assessee. The Ld. AR stated that the assessee is in a position to substantiate the source of cash deposit. The Ld. Sr. DR proposed dismissal of the appeal. 2. Keeping in mind the principles of natural justice, I accept the prayer of Ld. AR subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- which shall be deposited by the assessee within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order to the Poor Patient Relief Fund of PGI Hospital, Chandigarh. The proof of the same would be furnished by the assessee to Ld. AO who would proceed for de novo assessment. The assessee is directed to plead and prove its cases forthwith. 3. The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 09th July, 2026.

-Sd- (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AS Dated: 09/07/2026 आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत /Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु�/CIT 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड�फाईल/GF

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT CHANDIGARH

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →