AVTAR SINGH, LUDHIANA,LUDHIANA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5(1), LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 160/CHANDI/2026Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh08 July 2026AY 2015-20162 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, subject to the assessee paying a cost of Rs. 5,000/-. The appeals were restored to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals against assessment orders for AY 2015-16 and 2016-17. The CIT(A) confirmed the assessments due to the assessee's non-representation. There was a significant delay in filing the appeals.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned and the matter be adjudicated afresh by the CIT(A) on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, CHANDIGARH

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No.160/CHANDI/2026
ITA No.161/CHANDI/2026

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, CHANDIGARH HYBRID HEARING HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM 1. आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA No.160/CHANDI/2026 (िनधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 2. आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA No.161/CHANDI/2026 (िनधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Shri Avtar Singh ITO Ward 5(1) H. No. 451, Shimlapuri Aaykar Bhawan, Rishi Nagar बनाम/ Vs. Street No. 14, Barota Road Ludhiana, Punjab Ludhiana – 141003 �ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. BOUPS-0390-E (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (��थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Sh. Kaushal Chopra (CA) – Ld. AR (Virtual) ��थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Sh. Vivek Vardhan (Addl. CIT) - Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 08-07-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement 09-07-2026 : आदेश / O R D E R 1. Aforesaid appeals by assessee for Assessment Years (AY) 2015- 16 & 2016-17 arises out of separate orders dated 25.09.2024 & 30.09.2024 of learned first appellate authority. In AY 2015-16, an assessment was framed by Ld. AO u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 29.03.2022 wherein Ld. AO made addition of Rs.35.03 Lacs. In AY 2016-17, Ld. AO made similar addition of Rs.3.89 Lacs. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed both the assessments for want of any representation from

the assessee. The registry has noted delay of 418 days in both the appeals, the condonation of which has been sought by Ld. AR. The Ld. AR also prayed for restoring the appeal back to Ld. CIT(A) on the ground that the assessee is in a position to substantiate its case. The same has been opposed by Ld. Sr. DR. 2. Keeping in mind the principles of natural justice, I accept the prayer of Ld. AR subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- which shall be deposited by the assessee within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order to the Poor Patient Relief Fund of PGI Hospital, Chandigarh. The proof of the same would be furnished by the assessee to Ld. CIT(A) who would proceed for de novo adjudication for both the years. The assessee is directed to plead and prove its cases forthwith. 4. Both the appeals stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 09th July, 2026.

-Sd- (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AS Dated: 09/07/2026 आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत /Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु�/CIT 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड�फाईल/GF

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT CHANDIGARH

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →