DCIT-19(1), MUMBAI, LAL BAUG, PAREL vs. NITIN KSHIRSAGAR (HUF), MUMBAI

ITA 694/MUM/2026Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 July 2026AY 2020-2121 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH MUMBAI

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, Ld. AR
For Respondent: DR Assessee by Shri Rakesh Joshi, Ld. AR
Hearing: 23.06.2026Pronounced: 08.07.2026

PER MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, AM: This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 11.11.2025 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as "the CIT(A)"], under section 250 of the 2 Nitin Kshirsagar (HUF) Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act"], for the assessment year 2020-21. The impugned appellate order arises from the assessment order dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Assessment Unit under section 143(3) read with section 144B of the Act. Facts of the Case

2.

The assessee is a Hindu Undivided Family and is the proprietor of M/s Admyre Advertisi

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.