BERNARDO BORGES ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 34(1)(1) , MUMBAI
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR
PER MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, AM: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 06.01.2026 passed by the learned CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi SA No. 93/Mum/2026 Mr. Bernardo Borges [hereinafter referred to as "the CIT(A)"] under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961[hereinafter referred to as "the Act"], for A.Y. 2015-16. The stay application filed by the assessee arises out of the very same appeal and seeks stay of recovery of the outstanding d
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.