KUMAR TRADING COMPANY,RAMPUR, UTTAR PRADESH vs. ITO-1(3), RAMPUR-2, RAMPUR, UTTAR PRADESH
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The CIT(A) correctly set aside the assessment order and remitted it back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination, considering the ex-parte nature of the assessment and the interest of natural justice. The Tribunal found no illegality in this decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Kumar Trading Company, failed to file a return of income for AY 2018-19. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment ex-parte under Section 147 read with Section 144, making additions based on best judgment. The assessee objected to these additions during appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether an ex-parte assessment completed under Section 144 can be set aside and remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination in the interest of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
P a g e | 1 ITA No.775/Del/2026 Kumar Trading Company (AY: 2018-19) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.775/Del/2026 (Assessment Year: 2018-19)
Kumar Trading Company Vs. ITO-1(3) C/o Mr. Sovendra Kumar, Rampur-2, Income Tax Village Patia, Tehsil, Office, 6 Kothi Khasbhag, Milak, District Rampur Rampur, Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh – 244901 244901 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: AAIFK8842J Appellant .. Respondent
Appellant by : Sh. Amarbir Singh Walia, Adv. Respondent by : Sh. Balkrishan Gopal, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing 01.07.2026 Date of Pronouncement 08.07.2026
O R D E R PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 13.11.2025 of the Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi (hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in DIN & Order No: ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082598927(1) arising
P a g e | 2 ITA No.775/Del/2026 Kumar Trading Company (AY: 2018-19) out of the assessment order dated 21.03.2023 u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B
of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by
NFAC, for AY: 2018-19.
On hearing both sides we find that the issue involved is the additions
made by the Assessing Officer on account of failure of assesse firm to file
return of income and the addition made @ 10% of the turnover which has
been set aside by ld. CIT(A) by following relevant findings:
“5.1 I have carefully considered the grounds of appeal, statement of facts, the submissions made by the appellant, the assessment order, and all other material available on record. It is evident from the record that the assessment for AY 2018-19 has been completed ex-parte u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s. 144B on best judgment basis. The appellant has not responded to any of the statutory notices issued during assessment except for filing a Nil return in response to notice u/s 148 of the IT Act and this resulted in the addition: of Rs. 64,08,850/- as business income of the assessee. Now, during the course of appeal proceedings, the assessee is objecting to the addition of 10% of total credits in bank account as business income of the assessee. 5.2 Given the circumstances and in the interest of natural justice, the appellant deserves an opportunity to present all relevant evidence and explanations before the Assessing Officer. Especially considering that the new proviso to section 251(1)(a) inserted by Finance Bill, 2024, w.e.f. 01.10.2024) specifically empowers the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside a section 144 assessment and remit it back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination. Such a course of action is warranted in the facts of this case to ensure a proper and just determination of taxable income on merits after full consideration of all relevant material.”
At the time of hearing it was pointed out that in regard to AY: 2020-
21 also in consequence to reopening assesse has furnished copy of
dissolution deed and it was submitted that the business was taken over by
one of the partner as proprietorship concern who has been filing return
independently and the turnover reported in the bank accounts have been
P a g e | 3 ITA No.775/Del/2026 Kumar Trading Company (AY: 2018-19) subject to the return filed by the proprietor. Though ld. Counsel has tried to defend the issue on merits. We find that ld. CIT(A) was correct in restoring the issue to assessing officer as the assessment was completed u/s 144 of the Act. The submissions which ld. Counsel has relied including those made for AY; 2020-21 which have been accepted by the Assessing Officer to drop the proceedings can very well be taken into account by ld. Assessing Officer and the impugned order of Ld. CIT(A) suffers from no illegality which requires our interference. Accordingly, the appeal of assesse is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 08.07.2026
Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay Awasthi) (Anubhav Sharma) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated 08.07.2026 Rohit, Sr. PS Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Ramshrayashil Constructions PVT.LTD vs. Union Of INDIA Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Government Of INDIAJharkhand · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Kiea Corporate Business Solutions vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Vrajman Enterprises vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 2 Nov 2026
- Nimmakayala Padmavathi vs. The Union Of INDIAAndhra Pradesh · 2 Nov 2026
- Som Nath Nagar Mal Th Partner Sanjay Mahajan vs. Union Of INDIA Th Department Of Financial Services, Ministry Of Finance And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 2 Nov 2026