ANIL KUMAR AGARWAL,ALIGARH vs. DCIT CIRCLE 4(1)(1), ALIGARH
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits. The assessee was directed to be diligent and cooperative in future hearings, and the CIT(A) was instructed to ensure the principles of natural justice are observed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex-parte, confirming an addition of Rs. 7,45,81,747/-. The CIT(A) had issued multiple notices, but the assessee failed to respond.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without affording a proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA (DB
Before: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA (DB) BENCH, AGRA BEFORE : SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 214/Agr/2026 Assessment Year: 2021-22 Anil Kumar Agarwal, Vs. DCIT Circle 4(1)(1), Om Sons Industries, Aligarh-202001 Chiranjilal Ka Patch, Delhi Gate, Aligarh-202001 PAN : AAJPA7556N (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by None Department by Smt Sangeeta Yadav, CIT (DR) Date of hearing 07.07.2026 Date of pronouncement 07.07.2026 ORDER PER: SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, J.M.
This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 05.01.2026 passed in appeal No NFAC/2020-21/10223132 by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax/ National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A) u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for the A.Y. 2021-22, wherein ld CIT(A) has dismissed assessee’s appeal ex-parte, confirming the addition of Rs. 7,45,81,747/- made in the income of the assessee u/s 69C of the Act, vide
ITA No.214/Agr/2026
assessment order dated 30.12.2022 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Act. 2. Appellant assessee has preferred this second appeal on the various grounds including the one that that ld CIT(A) has confirmed the said additions without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 3. Perused the records. None responded for the appellant assessee. Heard ld CIT (DR) in attendance for the respondent revenue. 4. It transpires form the perusal of records that notices on 04.08.2025, 12.11.2025 and 27.11.2025 were issued by the first appellate authority to the assessee. However, the assessee did not respond in compliance thereof. The ld CIT(A) was thus compelled to pass impugned order ex- parte. The non-cooperative conduct of the assessee cannot be appreciated. However, in the interest of justice, we deem it just and appropriate to restore the matter back to the file of ld CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits. We, further, direct the assessee to be diligent and cooperative in attending the hearings and making submissions before the ld CIT(A) for the expeditious and effective disposal. Needless to say that ld CIT(A) shall ensure the observance of the principles of natural justice. The appeal is liable to be allowed for statistical purposes.
2 | P a g e
ITA No.214/Agr/2026
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on - 07.07.2026
Sd/- Sd/- (BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH) (SUNIL KUMAR SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated:09.07.2026 *Aamir Siddiqui, PS Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Agra
3 | P a g e
More judgments on Section 69C
- Madhusudhan Gade, Nizamabad vs ITO., Ward-1, NizamabadITA 379/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed28 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Jitendrakumar Bhikhabhai Shrimali, Mehsana vs ITO Ward 1, MehsaanaITA 1290/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sonu Jain, Agra vs ITO WD(1)(1)(2), AgraITA 671/AGR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mritunjay Singh, Kudra vs AO, SasaramITA 454/PAT/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2017-2018
- Shantilal Mafaji Kachchhava, Banaskantha vs ITO WD 1 Palanpur, PalanpurITA 2256/AHD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaista Praween vs. The Assistant Commissoner Of GST And Central Excise, RourkelaOrissa · 6 Nov 2026
- Paonta Hp Centre vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 5 Nov 2026
- M/S Multitech Agro INDIA (Opc) PVT LTD vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 5 Nov 2026
- Gopa Satya Madhava Subbarao vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 5 Nov 2026
- M/S Kallu Cable vs. The Commissioner State Goods And Service TaxUttarakhand · 5 Nov 2026