VISHAL BANSAL,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, LUDHIANA

ITA 885/CHANDI/2026Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 July 2026AY 2018-192 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, CHANDIGARH

For Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) - Ld. Sr. DR (Virtual)
1.

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2018- 19 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC [CIT(A)] dated 18.03.2026 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s 147 r.ws. 144B of the Act on 20.02.2024. In the assessment order, Ld. AO disallowed purchases of Rs.15.11 Lacs. The Ld. CIT(A) did not admit the appeal for want of condonation of delay of 176 days. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal b

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.