BHAGVATIBEN NAVNITBHAI PATEL,BHANER-KATHLAL vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, NADIAD
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:
-
This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the appellate order dated 10.03.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, relating to the Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
That the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts while adjudicating the appeal of the appellant and passed an order without appreciating the grounds of appeal and statement of facts on record, and therefore the order passed on limitation required to be quashed. Asst. Year : 2018-19 - 2–
That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred both in law and on facts while sustaining the heavy addition of Rs. 1,07,14,289/- made by A.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.