SATISH DHONDIRAM MALSHETTE,LATUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, LATUR

ITA 1029/PUN/2026Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 July 2026AY 2019-204 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE

Before: SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE

Hearing: 06.07.2026Pronounced: 09.07.2026

PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of CIT(A)/NFAC, Nasik passed u/sec 250 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2019-20. The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) and sustaining the addition of unexplained cash deposits u/sec69A of the Act made by the Assessing Officer.

2.

At the time of hearing, the Ld.AR submitted that there is a delay of 2 days in filing the appeal before Hon'ble Tribunal and the delay was not intentional and the assessee has filed an affidavit for condonatio

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.