ATUL SHRIVASTAVA,BHARATPUR vs. ITO WARD 2, BHARATPUR
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, “SMC” BENCH, JAIPUR
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, Addl./JCIT(A), Chennai 02(hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)”), dated 19.09.2025under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:-
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessment order passed under Section 144 of the Act is bad in law being arbitrary and opposed to requirement of law.
P a g e | 2 Atul Shrivastava
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Learned CIT (Appeals) has grossly erred in confirming the order of the Assessing Authority in making addition of Rs. 5,05
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.