JIGNESHKUMAR HASMUKHBHAI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2)(1), VADODARA, VADODARA

ITA 834/AHD/2026Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 July 2026AY 2010-115 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: Shri Sanjay Garg

For Appellant: Shri Parimalsingh Parmar, AR
Hearing: 23/07/2026Pronounced: 29/07/2026

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), ADDL/JCIT(A)-1, Nashik [hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld. CIT(A)’] dated 12/02/2026 passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:

“1. The Ld CIT(A) has erred, both in law and on facts, in I confirming the action of AO in reopening the assessment under section 147 of the Act.

2.

The Ld CIT(A) has erred, both in law And on facts, in confirming the addition of Rs 8,00,000/

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.