MRS. ROSILY JOHNY KANICHUNNAN ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 42(3)(2), MUMBAI
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM
Per Arun Khodpia, AM: This appeal is preferred by the assessee, directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [in short, “the Ld. CIT(A)”], dated 04.12.2025 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16,arisesout of the assessment order under section 147 r.w.s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, “the Act”] dated 29.02.2024, passed by Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department [in short, “the Ld. AO”]. Mrs. Rosily Johny Kanichunnan
The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under:
“1. The learned CIT
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.