DABUR INDIA LIMITED,DELHI vs. ACIT/DCIT, CR BUILDING, ITO
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2018-19. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal, stating it was a duplicate filing due to a clerical error.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to a duplicate filing. The assessee's request for withdrawal was granted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘A’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘A’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.3367/Del/2026 Assessment Year: 2018-19 M/s Dabur India Ltd., Vs. DCIT, 8/3, Asaf Ali Road, Circle-7(1), New Delhi New Delhi PAN: AAACD0474C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by None Department by Sh. Zafarul Haque Tanweer, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 27.07.2026 Date of pronouncement 27.07.2026 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2018-19, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short, the “CIT(A)”], Delhi’s-44 order dated 23.02.2026 having DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1086400167(1), involving proceedings under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
ITA No.3367/Del/2026
Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte. 2. It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming from the Revenue side that the assessee has sought for withdrawal of the instant appeal vide application dated 24.07.2026, reading as under: “Dear Sir, It is respectfully submitted that, due to an inadvertent clerical error, the above-mentioned appeal for AY 2018-19 against the order passed by CIT(A) u/s 250 is filed twice before the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. This appeal is listed for hearing before the Tribunal on 27 July 2026. The other appeal (ITTPA 256/DEL/2026) for AY 2018-19 against the order passed u/s 250 on the same issues is scheduled for hearing on 10 August 2026. Since the duplicate appeal filing was unintentional and the other appeal on the same issue is already on record, the present appeal has become redundant. In view of the above, the appellant respectfully requests that the present appeal may kindly be withdrawn and may be dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant sincerely regrets the inconvenience caused to the Hon'ble Tribunal and undertakes that the duplicate filing was purely inadvertent and without any intention to mislead. We, therefore, request your goodself to kindly permit the withdrawal of the present appeal and oblige.” Learned department representative has no objection to the instant withdrawal of appeal. Ordered accordingly. 4. This assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn subject to all just exceptions. 2 | P a g e
ITA No.3367/Del/2026
Order pronounced in the open court on 27th July, 2026 Sd/- Sd/- (NAVEEN CHANDRA) (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 29th July, 2026. RK/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
3 | P a g e
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee And Anr vs. Galactic Television And Communications PVT LTD And OrsDelhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Society For Human Resource Management Shrm vs. Strategic Hrm & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Sanjay Kumar Jain & Anr. vs. Nandi Ayurved & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Beiersdorf Ag & Anr. vs. Duvac Cosmedics & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Namastu Enterprise Private Limited vs. Kajalben Maheshbhai Kaklotar (Proprietor Of Khodal Enterprise) And AnrDelhi · 3 Nov 2026