KAVITA YADAV,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-28(1), CIVIC CENTRE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw these appeals as they were duplicate filings and intended to pursue only one appeal (ITA No. 1638/Del/2026) which had identical facts and grounds. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed two appeals (ITA Nos. 1639 & 1640/DEL/2026) for AY 2013-14 against assessment orders passed under Section 147. These appeals were stated to be duplicate of another appeal filed by the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals filed were duplicate and if they could be withdrawn by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
PER SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: Both appeals have been preferred by the same assessee against the order dated 11-11.2025 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ National Faceless Appeal Centre, New Delhi, [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’] arising out of assessment order both dated 30.03.2022 passed u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 pertaining to Assessment Years both 2013-14. The word ‘Act’ herein this order would mean Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that it may be allowed to withdraw the above appeals since they are duplicate appeals filed in
ITA 1639/DEL/2026 KAVITA YADAV
connection to the appeal filed bearing ITA No.1638/Del/2026. It was submitted that the assessee would like to pursue ITA No.1638/Del/2026 only, which is raised on identical facts and grounds. 3. Accordingly, ITA No.1639/Del/2026 and ITA No.1640/Del/2026 are dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 25th June, 2026.
Sd/- Sd/- [ANUBHAV SHARMA] [AMITABH SHUKLA] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 29.07.2026 Shekhar Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. PCIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi,
Page 2 of 2
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Som Nath Nagar Mal Th Partner Sanjay Mahajan vs. Union Of INDIA Th Department Of Financial Services, Ministry Of Finance And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 2 Nov 2026
- Mohd. Aqil Proprietor Of M/S Ma Garments vs. Principal Commissioner Central GST, Delhi And Anr.Delhi · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Crs Builders Private Limited vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- Noore Manpower Services vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- Maa Bhawani Minrals vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026