REETA SINGH,BOKARO vs. ITO WARD 3(1), BOKARO/, BOKARO
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
PER: BENCH
This is the appeal filed by the assessee against confirmation of penalty levied under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) passed by the ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No. NFAC/2015-16/10408586 dated 22/01/2026 for the A.Y. 2016-17. 2. Shri Raju Prasad, ld. A.R. is represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Sandipan Khan, ld. Sr.DR is represented on behalf of the revenue.
It was submitted by the ld. AR that the assessee had sold an immovable property representing agricultural land for a consideration of Rs. 90.24 lacs and the cost of the compound wall, the assessee had received an amount of Rs. 1.00 crore in the form of two cheques on 10/0
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.