BIHAR ANIMAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY,BIHAR vs. DC/AC EXEMPTION CIR PATNA, PATNA BIHAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4/PAT/2026Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 July 2026AY 2019-205 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that non-filing of the return under Section 139(4C) disentitles the assessee from claiming exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiab). However, the entire interest income cannot be taxed, and the assessee is entitled to a deduction of expenses incurred to earn such income.

What were the facts?

The assessee, an university, claimed exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiab) but failed to file its return of income under Section 139(4C). The Assessing Officer taxed the interest income earned from bank deposits, and the CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether non-filing of a return under Section 139(4C) bars an assessee from claiming exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiab), and if so, whether the entire interest income is taxable.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 139(4C),Section 148

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH

Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI YOGESH KUAMR U.S.

For Appellant: CA Ankit Kumar, AR
For Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Chowdhary, Sr. DR
Hearing: 29.06.2026Pronounced: 30.07.2026

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PATNA BENCH (VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA) BEFORE SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI YOGESH KUAMR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.4/PAT/2026 Assessment Year: 2019-20

Bihar Animal Sciences Vs. DC/ AC Exemption University Circle, Patna Finance Comptroller Office, Bihar-800001 BASU, B.V. College, Patna Bihar-800014 [PAN: AAAJB1535B] APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : CA Ankit Kumar, AR Respondent by : Shri Ravi Kant Chowdhary, Sr. DR Date of hearing : 29.06.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 30.07.2026 O R D E R PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER: This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi[ “the Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 29.11.2025 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2019-20.

2.

Brief facts of the case are that, Assessee is an University established by Bihar Animal Sciences University Act (BASU). The Assessee became operational from 13.06.2017 and since the inception, Assessee has been claiming exemption of its income u/s

ITA No.4/Pat/2026 Bihar Animal Sciences University; A.Y.: 2019-20 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act. During the year under consideration, Assessee has not filed return as required u/s 139(4C) of the Act.

3.

The case of the Assessee taken for scrutiny for the reason that during the relevant period, Assessee has received interest income and made deposits. The source of the FDRs made remained unexplained and interest received during the year has remained undeclared. The Assessee filed return of income in response to notice issued u/s 148 of the Act declaring NIL income after exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act of Rs.30,70,086/-. An Assessment Order came to be passed on 21.02.20224 treating the interest income of Rs.2,12,99,197/- earned from bank deposits as taxable under the head of “Income from Other Source” on the ground that Assessee has not filed return u/s 139(4C) of the Act which disentitles the Assessee from claiming exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act. Aggrieved by the Assessment Order dated 21.02.2024, Assessee preferred an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) vide Order dated 29.11.2025, dismissed the Appeal filed by the Assessee.

4.

The Learned Counsel for the Assessee vehemently submitted that, admittedly Assessee is fully and/ or substantially financed by the Government of Bihar and Central Government and exists solely for educational purpose since its inception. The Assessee has been

ITA No.4/Pat/2026 Bihar Animal Sciences University; A.Y.: 2019-20 claiming exemption of its income u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act. Further submitted that, the interest income in question had already been included in the gross receipt for impart of exempt income. The Assessing Officer during the assessment proceedings agreed with the Assessee’s contention and accepted that Assessee is eligible for exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act and allowed the exemption of Rs.36,30,70,086/- in the computation, however erroneously treated the interest income of Rs.2,12,99,197/- earned from the bank deposits as taxable under the head of “Income from Other Source”. Learned Counsel further submitted that, non-filing of return of income u/s 139(4C) of the Act cannot disentitles the Assessee from claim exemption merely on a procedural lapse, especially when return was duly filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act. The Learned Counsel submitted that since the interest income is already included in the bank receipts and been exempted, bringing the same the interest income to tax separately resulting in double taxation. Thus, sought for allowing the Appeal.

5.

Per Contra, the Ld. DR submitted that, to claim exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act, one of the mandatory requirements is to file the return u/s 139(4C) of the Act and non-filing of return u/s 139(4C) of the Act disentitles the Assessee from claiming the

ITA No.4/Pat/2026 Bihar Animal Sciences University; A.Y.: 2019-20 exemption. The Ld. DR relying on the conclusion of the Authorities below and sought for dismissal of the Appeal.

6.

We have heard the parties and perused the material available on record. The Assessee earned interest income of Rs.2,12,99,194/- from the bank deposits which has been taxed by the Assessing Officer under the head of ‘income from other source’ on the ground that Assessee has not filed return u/s 139(4C) of the Act which disentitles the Assessee from claiming exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act. It is an admitted fact that Assessee has not filed return of income u/s 139(4C) of the Act. As per section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act, it is mandatory requirement to file the return of income u/s 139(4C) of the Act. Therefore, the Authorities below rightly held that non-filing of the return u/s 139(4C) of the Act disentitles the Assessee from claiming exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act. However, the entire interest income cannot be taxed and the Assessee is entitle for deduction of expenses. The income should be computed in accordance with the strict Commercial Accounting Principles. In other words, corresponding deduction of expenses incurred to earn such interest income shall be granted to the Assessee. With the above observations, the issue is remitted to the file of the Assessing Officer for compliance.

ITA No.4/Pat/2026 Bihar Animal Sciences University; A.Y.: 2019-20 7. In the result, Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 30.07.2026. Sd/- Sd/- (LAXMI PRASAD SAHU) (YOGESH KUMAR U.S.) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 30.07.2026 DP, PS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. Pr. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. CIT(DR) //TRUE COPY//

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA

More judgments on Section 139(4C)

All 45 judgments and leading authorities on Section 139(4C) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →