BILAS PATI SASMAL,HOOGHLY vs. ITO, WARD24(1), HOOGHLY
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH,
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These two Appeals are filed by the Assessee against the orders of the NFAC, Delhi (‘Ld. CIT(A)’ for short) dated 13.02.2026, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2019-20 & 2020-21 respectively.
There is a delay of 16 days in filing the captioned Appeals. The Assessee filed Affidavit in support of condonation of delay in filing the Appeal. The Ld. DR submitted that, there is no sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay in filing these Appeals, thus sought for dismissal of the above appeals on delay in latches.
ITA Nos.1836 & 1837/Kol/2026 Bilas Pati Sasmal; A.Y: 2019-20 & 2020-21
For th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.