BHARATIYA DARSHAN ADHYATMIK KENDRA,NAVI MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

ITA 4770/MUM/2026Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 July 2026AY 2026-274 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH

Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA

For Appellant: Shri Dinesh Shah
For Respondent: Shri Rajdeep Singh, CIT DR
Hearing: 30/07/2026Pronounced: 30/07/2026

PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): These two appeals have been preferred by the assessee- trust against the separate orders dated 28.02.2026 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai, whereby the assessee’s application for renewal of registration under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential application for renewal of approval under section 80G of the Act came to be rejected.

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the impugned orders have proceeded on an incorrect factual premise that the assessee had failed to furnish the details and documents called for by the learned CIT(E). Inviting our attention to the fact-sheet and chrono

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.