HITESHA SACHIN TAKUR,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 22(1)(6), MUMBAI
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH; MUMBAI
PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M : This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [‘Ld.CIT(A)’], dated 02.01.2026, pertaining to Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16, wherein the ld. CIT(A) has sustained the levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) amounting to Rs. 3,75,652/-.
Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee did not file her return of income originally u/s. 139(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the proceedings were initiated u/s. 147 and notice u/s. 148 was issued. In response, the assessee filed her return of income stating that the same
ITA No.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.