SURAJ CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,KHAR WEST vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 22 3 4 MUMBAI, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) failed to adjudicate the appeal on merits as required by Section 250(6) of the Act. Dismissal for non-prosecution without deciding the issues on merits is unsustainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-compliance with hearing notices. The Assessing Officer had made additions under sections 80P and 69A.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) can dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution without deciding the substantive grounds of appeal on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN & SHRI JAGADISH
Per: SHRI JAGADISH, A.M.:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 21.01.2025 passed by the learned Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Raipur [“learned CIT(A)”], under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”), arising from the assessment order dated 10.12.2019 passed under section 143(3) of the Act for the assessment year 2017-18.
ITA No.3758/M/2026 Suraj Co-op Credit Society Limited
The assessee has raised grounds challenging, inter alia, the dismissal of its appeal without adjudication on merits, disallowance of deduction of ₹25,75,356 under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act and addition of ₹66,06,561 under section 69A of the Act.
Briefly stated, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act at a total income of ₹91,81,920 after disallowing the deduction claimed under section 80P and treating cash deposits of ₹66,06,561 as unexplained money under section 69A of the Act. The assessee carried the matter in appeal before the learned CIT(A).
The learned CIT(A), noticing that the assessee had not complied with the notices of hearing, dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution by relying, inter alia, upon the decision in CIT v. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd. (38 ITD 320). Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. We find that the learned CIT(A) has not adjudicated the grounds raised by the assessee on merits and has dismissed the appeal merely for non-prosecution. Under section 250(6) of the Act, the learned CIT(A) is required to dispose of the appeal on merits by stating the points for determination, the decision thereon and the reasons for such decision. Therefore, the dismissal of the appeal by applying the decision in Multiplan India (P.) Ltd. (supra), without deciding the issues on merits, cannot be sustained.
Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the entire appeal is restored to the file of the learned CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits, after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to cooperate in the appellate proceedings and furnish the necessary details within the time allowed.
ITA No.3758/M/2026 Suraj Co-op Credit Society Limited
We have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the issues raised in the appeal.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 30/07/2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (SANDEEP GOSAIN) (JAGADISH) Judicial Member Accountant Member
Mumbai, Dated: 30/07/2026 Ashwani Rao Sr. Private Secretary
Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The CIT (Appeals) 5. The DR, I.T.A.T. By order
(Assistant Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mohd. Aqil Proprietor Of M/S Ma Garments vs. Principal Commissioner Central GST, Delhi And Anr.Delhi · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Crs Builders Private Limited vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- Noore Manpower Services vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- Maa Bhawani Minrals vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026