AZAD SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. ITO-WARD 58(7) DELHI, NEW DELHI

At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed its case ex-parte and thus its right to natural justice of being heard has been violated. The ld. Counsel submitted that the assessee was prevented by compelling person reason were making requisite compliance to the statutory notices of ld. CIT(A). It was submitted that the impugned conduct of the assessee was neither intentional nor mala fide. It was accordingly requested that the matter be kindly considered for remission back to the ld. CIT(A) for adjudication de novo. The ld. Counsel personally ensured that full compliance shall now been made. 3. The ld. DR while relying upon the order of the lower authorities did not seriously oppose the move. 4. We have heard rival submissions in the light of material available on records. The misconduct of the assessee in not complying to the statutory notices of the ld. First Appellate Authority are evident from the assailed appellate order dated 09.03.2026. We are however in agreement with the justification tendered for the impugned non-compliance. We are also conscious of the fact that no litigant benefits by non-prosecution of its case. Availability of reasonable opportunity of being heard is every litigants natural right and can not be violated. Accordingly in the interest of justice, we remit the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for adjudication de novo in accordance with law, while according opportunity of being heard and by passing a speaking order. The assessee shall