LATE KAILASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL, MAHASAMUND, REPRESENTED BY LEGAL HEIR ANKUSH AGRAWAL,MAHASAMUND vs. ITO, WARD MAHASAMUND, MAHASAMUND
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “DB”, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, passed under section 250 r.w.s 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 on 24.02.2026 emanating from assessment order under section 147 r.w.s 144B of the Act dated 22.03.2022. 2 Late Kailash Chandra Agrawal Through Legal Heir Ankush Agrawal
Findings and Analysis :
No one appeared on behalf of the assessee. No adjournment letter filed, hence, we proceeded ex parte qua assessee. We heard L
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.