RAMAKRISHNA,BENGALURU URBAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2)(1), BANGALORE, BENGALURU URBAN
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC dated 21.01.2025 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1072380243(1) passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) for the assessment year 2015-16. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:-
The Order UIs 250 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeals centre, Delhi, (CIT(A)-NFAC) confirming the penalty u/s 271 (I)(c) passed by the Income Tax Officer, Kar dated 21/01/2025 is bad in law.
The Order of the learned (CIT(A)-NFAC), passed under section
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.