DEEPA RAMCHANDRA KHADE,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 22(1)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 8688/MUM/2025Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 July 2026AY 2017-188 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI

Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI, HON’BLE & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, HON’BLE

Pronounced: 31/07/2026

PER SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

Present appeal filed by assessee arises out of the order passed by NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Ld.CIT(A)”] dated 29/09/2025, for A.Y. 2017-18, on the following grounds of appeal:-

“1. The CIT(A) has erred in upholding the assessment order passed u/s. 144 r.w.s 263 of the Act which is illegal and bad in law.

2.

The CIT(A) has erred in upholding the addition of Rs.

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.