TAREEKAT,MEERUT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(2)(4), MEERUT

ITA 2222/DEL/2026Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 July 2026AY 2018-193 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA

Hearing: 16.07.2026Pronounced: 16.07.2026

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2018-19, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1084214833(1), dated 30.12.2025, involving proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2.

The assessee raises the following sole substantive ground: “On the facts and in law, the learned CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition made by the learned AO by treating cash withdrawn from the appellant's own bank account as unexplained expenditure under section 69C. The appellant acted only as a transfer agent for Weizmann Forex Ltd. (now EbixCash World Mone

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.