MALAR RESIDENCY,MADURAI vs. ITO, NON CORP, 2(3), MADURAI
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI
PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi [CIT(A) in short] dated 29.01.2026 confirming the penalty of Rs.10,00,000/- levied u/s. 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record.The facts, in brief, are that the assessee is a partnership
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.