RAMESH L. JAIN HUF,MUMBAI vs. ITO, PIRAMAL CHAMBERS
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRICHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM
Per Arun Khodpia, AM: This appeal is preferred by the assessee, directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [in short, “the Ld. CIT(A)”], dated 03.02.2026 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11, arises from the assessment order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short,“the Act”] dated 30.03.2019, passed byIncome Tax Officer – 19(3)(1), Mumbai [in short,“the Ld.AO”].The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under: Ramesh L. Jain HUF “1 The leamed Assessing Officer
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.