PADMA TULSIDAS SANGHAVI PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw its appeal as the grievance raised in the appeal no longer survived due to the subsequent renewal of registration. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a public charitable trust, appealed against the CIT(E)'s order rejecting its application for approval under Section 80G. The assessee later received renewal of registration under Section 80G(5) pursuant to a High Court direction.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal survives when the assessee has subsequently obtained the relief sought. The issue of withdrawal of appeal by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRINARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM
आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण�ायपीठमुंबईम�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRINARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM I.T.A. No.1175/Mum/2026 (Assessment Year: N.A.) Padma Tulsidas Sanghavi Commissioner of Income Tax Public Charitable Trust (Exemption), Mumbai 27, 1st Floor, Shreeji Villa CHSL, Room No.601, 6th Floor, MTNL Tel. Vs. T H Kataria Marg, Mahim, Ex. Building Peddar Road, Cumballa Mumbai-400016 Hill, Mumbai-400026 PAN: AAATP3308E Assessee- अपीलाथ� / Appellant Revenue-��थ�/ Respondent : Assesseeby : Kumar Kale (Virtually appeared) Revenueby : Shri Alok Singh (CIT DR) : 24.06.2026 Date of Hearing : 03.08.2026 Date of Pronouncement
O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, AM: This appeal is preferred by the assessee, against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai [in short,“the Ld. CIT(E)”], dated 26.12.2025 rejecting the application of assessee for approval u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short,“the Act”].
At the outset, Ld. Counsel of the assessee who has appeared virtually has submitted that a letter dated 22nd June 2026 is furnished before the Tribunal, according to which the assessee has challenged the impugned order of Ld. CIT(E), however now the Ld. CIT(E), Mumbai vide order dated 04.05.2026 has
ITA No. 1175/Mum/2026 Padma Tulsidas Sanghavi Public Charitable Trust granted renewal of registration u/s 80G(5) of the Act in pursuance to directions of Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Chamber of Tax Consultants vs. CIT(E) [2026] 184 taxman.com 374 (Bombay). Therefore, the grievance raised by the assessee in the present appeal does not survive.
Under such circumstances, assessee prays for withdrawal of the captioned appeal.
Considering the aforesaid request of assessee vide aforesaid letter and further submissions during the virtual hearing seeking withdrawal of the appeal, in absence of any objection by the Revenue (respondents), the appeal of assessee is permitted to withdrawn.
In result the appeal of assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 03.08.2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (ARUN KHODPIA) (NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai, Dated : 03-08-2026. Ankit K., Sr. PS
ITA No. 1175/Mum/2026 Padma Tulsidas Sanghavi Public Charitable Trust
Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 4. Guard File 5. CIT
BY ORDER,
(Dy./Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kallu Cable vs. The Commissioner State Goods And Service TaxUttarakhand · 5 Nov 2026
- Prabhat Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 4 Nov 2026
- Siddharth Barai (Prop- Siddharth Design Studio) vs. The Superintendent CGST And Central Excise, Balangir RangeOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Shashibhusan Moharana vs. The Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, DhenkanalOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Paramount Tea Marketing PVT. LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 4 Nov 2026