AMIT KUMAR, PANCHKULA,PANCHKULA vs. JAO THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1) CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH
No AI summary yet for this case.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: HYBRID MODE BEFORE: SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & SH. RAJESH DAMODARLAL SHARMA, JM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No. 1079/Chd/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Amit Kumar, बनाम ITO Ward 2(1), House No. 670, Sec. 17 Sector 10, Panchkula Chandigarh - 160017 "ायीलेखासं./PAN NO: CNHPK9840C अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रतीकीओरसे/Assessee by : Sh. Rohit Garg, CA (Virtual) – Ld. AR राज"कीओरसे/ Revenue by : Sh. Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing :31.08.2026 उदघोषणाकीतारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 01.09.2026 आदेश/Order
PER RAJESH DAMODARLAL SHARMA, J.M: Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC [CIT(A)] dated 30-06-2025 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] on best judgment basis u/s 147 r.w.s 144 of 2 1079/Chd/2025 the Act on 31-12-2021 making addition of Rs. 127.50 Lacs u/s 69 of the Income Tax Act,1961. The assessee remained non-compliant therein.
The Ld. CIT(A), without any substantive findings, endorsed the view of Ld. AO against w
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.