HARSHAL RAJENDRAKUMAR TOKASE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(1), NASHIK
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE
Before: SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE & DR. MANISH BORAD
PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of CIT(A)/NFAC, Nasik passed u/sec 144 and u/sec250 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the order of the CIT(A) in not condoning the delay in filing the appeal and sustaining the addition made by the Assessing Officer.
The brief facts of the case are that, the assessee has filed the return of income for the A.Y. 2017-18 on 03.03.2018 disclosing a total income of Rs. 3,04,200/-. Subsequently, the case was selected for limited scrutiny under “
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.