SALAMA MAHMADSALIM DAFEDAR,BELGAUM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-2,BELGAUM, BELGAUM
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANAJI BENCH “SMC”, PANAJI – VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 12.12.2025 passed by Ld. Addl./JCIT(A)-9, Mumbai [‘Ld. CIT(A)’] for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. The appellant has raised the following grounds of appeal :- “1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the order of A.O. u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961 relating to an addition of Rs.11,21,090/- as unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A of the Act.
2
The learned CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that the entire money represents proceeds of inheritance which is not taxable in the hands of the appellant. 3.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.