NARMADA RAJAGOPALAN,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(3)(1), BANGALORE

ITA 285/BANG/2026Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 September 2026AY 2012-1312 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’BENCH: BANGALORE

Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY

For Appellant: CA Suman Lunkar, A.R
Hearing: 18.06.2026Pronounced: 03.09.2026

PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC dated 17.11.2025 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082683296(1) passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) for the assessment year 2012-13. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: -

1.

The learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) has erred in partially confirming the assessment order passed. The order passed by CIT(A) to the extent confirming the assessment order is bad in law and such order is liable to be quashed. Narmada Rajagopalan, Beng

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.