ELECTRONICA FINANCE LIMITED,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2231/PUN/2025Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 September 2026AY 2020-216 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found the assessee's submissions realistic and that the AO rejected the claim solely on the ground of not filing a revised return. The Tribunal held that the assessee should not be deprived of legitimate claims and granted an opportunity to substantiate the case.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a NBFC, filed a revised return of income and later a re-revised computation of income due to Ind AS adjustments. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim as it was not made in the filed return. The CIT(A) confirmed the AO's action.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be denied legitimate financial adjustments due to procedural non-compliance in filing revised returns, and whether proper opportunity was provided by the lower authorities.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 142(1),Section 250,Section 143(1),Section 251

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE

Before: DR. MANISH BORAD & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE

Hearing: 03.09.2026Pronounced: 07.09.2026

आदेशकीप्रतितितिअग्रेतिि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अिीिार्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The Pr. CIT concerned. 4. तिभागीयप्रतितिति,आयकरअिीिीयअतिकरण, “A” बेंच, पुणे/ DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. गार्डफ़ाइि / Guard File. 5.

आदेशािुसार / BY ORDER,

Assistant Registrar, आयकरअिीिीयअतिकरण,/ ITAT, Pune.

More judgments on Section 142(1)

All 17,244 judgments and leading authorities on Section 142(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →