DCIT 19 1 MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. B.M. ENTERPRISES, MUMBAI

ITA 5031/MUM/2026Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 September 2026AY 2012-1311 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B” MUMBAI

Before: SMT BEENA PILLAI & SMT RATNA DASGUPTA

For Respondent: Shri Ravindra Poojary
Hearing: 07/08/2026Pronounced: 07/09/2026

PER RATNA DASGPUTA, AM

The present appeal by the Revenue arises from order dated 25/02/2026 passed by the National Faceless Appeals Centre - hereinafter referred to as the Ld. CIT(A) - u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act - hereinafter referred to as "the Act".

B.M. Enterprises 2

2.

The grounds raised in appeal are as follows;-

i. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in restricting the addition to 5% of the alleged bogus purchases as against 100% disallowance made by the Assessing Officer u/s 69C, without properly appreciating the facts and evidences on record. ii. Whether on the facts and in the circum

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.