Facts
The assessee filed two appeals challenging ex-parte orders passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 2003-04 and 2010-11. The assessee contended that they were not provided proper and sufficient opportunity of hearing by the Ld. CIT(A), leading to a breach of natural justice, and attributed this to miscommunication with their AR.
Held
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal found reasonable cause for the assessee's inability to effectively represent their case before the Ld. CIT(A). The Tribunal restored the matter back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, granting another opportunity to the assessee, while also imposing a nominal cost of Rs. 2,000/- on the assessee for prior non-cooperation.
Key Issues
Whether the assessee was denied proper opportunity of hearing before the Ld. CIT(A), leading to ex-parte orders, and if the matter should be restored for fresh adjudication based on principles of natural justice.
Sections Cited
250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 1. ��थ� / The Respondent. 2. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / The CIT(A) 3. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / Concerned CIT 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मु�बई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 6.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स�ािपत �ित //True Copy//
उप/सहायक पंजीकार ( Asst. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मु�बई मु�बई / ITAT, Mumbai मु�बई मु�बई