ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 7 (1) , MUMBAI vs. ELECMEC ENGINEERING & PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding that the transactions were circular trading aimed at increasing turnover and availing bank credit, not for suppressing income. The Tribunal agreed that no further addition was warranted as the disclosed profits included commission income, and there was no evidence of cash transactions.
What were the facts?
A search operation revealed that the assessee company was involved in bogus purchase and sales transactions, misusing banking credit facilities. The Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the books of accounts and made additions based on estimated income from these transactions.
What were the issues?
Whether additions made by the AO on account of bogus purchase and sales transactions were justified, and if the profit disclosed by the assessee sufficiently accounted for any commission earned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Dhakeshwari Cotton\nMills Ltd. v. CIT10 citing26 ITR 776 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, HON’BLE & SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, HON’BLE
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER TRUE COPY
Assistant Registrar आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ITAT, Mumbai , 3057 & 3056/Mum/2025 C.O. Nos. 194, 195 & 196/Mum/2025 11
Initial Date 1. Draft dictated on 30/09/2025 Sr.PS
Draft placed before author 06/10/2025 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed JM/AM before the second member 4. Draft discussed/approved JM/AM by Second Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to /10/2025 Sr.PS/PS the Sr.PS/PS 6. File pronounced on /10/2025 Sr.PS 7. File sent to the Bench Clerk /10/2025 Sr.PS 8. Date on which file goes to the AR 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk. 10. Date of dispatch of Order. 11. Dictation Pad is enclosed Yes
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026