Facts
The assessee filed appeals challenging ex-parte assessment orders passed under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act and confirmed by the CIT(A). There was a significant delay of 990 days in filing the appeals, attributed to the death of the assessee's Chartered Accountant, her lack of knowledge of tax laws, and issues with receiving notices on the income tax portal.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, citing the principles of substantial justice over technicalities and accepting that the delay was due to reasons beyond the assessee's control. The Tribunal restored the matter back to the AO for de novo assessment.
Key Issues
Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned on grounds of sufficient cause, and whether the ex-parte assessment order passed without providing a fair opportunity to the assessee should be set aside.
Sections Cited
144, 250, 263, 253
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN& SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 1. ��थ� / The Respondent. 2. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / The CIT(A) 3. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / Concerned CIT 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,मु�बई/ DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 6.
आदेशानुसार/BY ORDER, स�ािपत �ित //True Copy//
उप/सहायक पंजीकार ( Asst. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मु�बई मु�बई / ITAT, Mumbai मु�बई मु�बई