SUPERIOR METAL OVERSEAS,MORADABAD vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, ASSESSMENT UNI OF INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 738/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2025AY 2020-21Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) finding sufficient cause. The appeal was restored to the CIT(A) to decide the issues on merits after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) with a delay of 170 days due to their counsel forgetting to file the appeal. The CIT(A) did not admit the appeal. The assessee requested condonation of delay.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) deserves condonation and whether the case should be remitted back to the CIT(A) for decision on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’: NEW DELHI

For Appellant: Shri Tariq Nufuir, Adv. &, Shri Adil Mohmood, CA
For Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh Sindhu
Hearing: 13/05/2025Pronounced: 13/05/2025

O R D E R

PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM:

1.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC [CIT(A) in short], in Appeal No. NFAC/2019-20/10234600 dated 24.12.2024 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2020-21.

2.

From the perusal of the appellate order, it is found that ld. CIT(A) has not admitted the appeal as the appeal was filed delay by Superior Metal Overseas vs. Assessment Unit 170 days before the Ld. CIT(A). The reasons given in delay condonation petition was that counsel who represented the assessee was directed to prepare the appeal, however, the said counsel got stuck up and forget to file the appeal. When assessee enquired about the status of appeal, it has come to its knowledge that appeal was not filed. Therefore, assessee immediately take necessary action and filed the appeal. In this process, the appeal was filed delayed before the Ld. CIT(A) by 170 days. The reason being sufficient and beyond the control of assessee, therefore, it was prayed before the Ld. CIT(A) to condone the delay and decide the appeal on merits. Further, it is seen that despite of issue of several notices, assessee has failed to make any compliance before the Ld. CIT(A).

3.

Under these circumstances and the interest of justice, we find that the reason given by the assessee for delay in filing in first appeal has sufficient cause, thus, we condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). As the Ld. CIT(A) has not decided the appeal of the assessee on merits, therefore, all the issues are restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) to decide the same on merits after providing reasonable opportunities of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to participate in the appellate proceedings and filed the necessary replies within this time limit provided by the Ld. CIT(A). With this directions, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →