← Back to search

RISHI RAJ,GURUGRAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GURUGRAM

PDF
ITA 1411/DEL/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 May 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI

Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara

For Appellant: None
For Respondent: Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR
Hearing: 27.05.2025Pronounced: 27.05.2025

This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2011-12, arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No.
ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1057418405(1) dated 26.10.2023, in proceedings u/s 271 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short
“the Act”).

2.

Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.

3.

It emerges at the outset during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(A)/NFAC’s detailed discussion has proceeded ex-parte against the assessee thereby affirming the Assessing Officer’s action making the corresponding disallowances/additions herein. Nor do I find any substantive lower appellate adjudication as contemplated u/s 250(6) of the Rishi Raj

2
Act requiring the CIT(A)/NFAC to first frame points of determination followed by a detailed discussion thereupon.

4.

Mr. Manoj Kumar vehemently argues during the course of hearing in support of CIT(A)’s finding that the assessee had not filed any explanation or evidence supporting it’s case and therefore, his instant appeal deserves to be dismissed.

5.

I have given our thoughtful consideration to the foregoing rival stand and are of the considered view that since the CIT(A) has proceeded ex-parte against the assessee, possibility of some communication gaps between the taxpayer and the arguing counsel involving the newly introduced system of faceless hearings, could not be altogether ruled out.

6.

Faced with this situation, in the larger interest of justice, I deem it appropriate to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A)/NFAC for it’s afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities subject to a rider that the taxpayer shall plead and prove the case at his own risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly. Rishi Raj

3
7. This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 27/05/2025. (Satbeer Singh Godara)

Judicial Member

Dated: 27/05/2025
*Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS*

RISHI RAJ,GURUGRAM vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, GURUGRAM | BharatTax