SATISH KUMAR JOON,ROHTAK vs. GURGAON, GURGAON

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short, the “CIT(A)”], Delhi’s-43 DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-
25/1072838067(1), dated 03.02.2025 involving proceedings under section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
2. Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.
3. It emerges at the outset during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(A) in it’s lower appellate order has Assessee by None
Department by Sh. Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, Sr. DR
Date of hearing
03.06.2025
Date of pronouncement
03.06.2025
2 | P a g e proceeded ex-parte against the assessee thereby affirming the Assessing Officer’s action making the corresponding disallowances/additions herein.
4. Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, learned departmental representative vehemently argues during the course of hearing in support of CIT(A)’s finding that the assessee had not filed any explanation or evidence supporting it’s case.
5. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the foregoing rival stand and I am of the considered view that since the CIT(A) has proceeded ex-parte against the assessee, possibility of some communication gaps between the taxpayer and the arguing counsel involving the newly introduced system of faceless hearings, could not be altogether ruled out.
6. Faced with this situation, in the larger interest of justice, I deem it appropriate to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A) for it’s afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities subject to a rider that the taxpayer shall 3 | P a g e plead and prove the case at his own risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.
7. This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 3rd June, 2025 (SATBEER SINGH GODARA)

JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 3rd June, 2025. RK/-