VINIT AGARWAL,GORAKHPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 02, GORAKHPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 66/VNS/2019Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi10 November 2021AY 2010-20112 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal as they had obtained a certificate under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for the assessment year 2010-11. The assessee later submitted an application to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal filed before the ITAT due to settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CIRCUIT BENCH ‘SMC’, VARANASI

Before: SHRI A. D. JAIN

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Bansal, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar, D.R
Hearing: 10/11/2021Pronounced: 10/11/2021

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of learned CIT(A), Gorakhpur dated nil pertaining to assessment year 2010-2011.

2.

The assessee has submitted an application dated 09/11/2021, vide which it has been submitted that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Gorakhpur has issued a certificate in Form No. 3 on 08/01/2021 under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. A copy of such Form No. 3 has also been filed. It is contended that the assessee, therefore, wants to withdraw the present Assessment Year:2010-11 2 appeal. Learned D. R. has no objection. Accordingly, I permit the assessee to withdraw the present appeal.

3.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Order pronounced in the open court on 10/11/2021)

Sd/. ( A. D. JAIN ) Vice President Dated:10/11/2021 *Singh Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. Concerned CIT 4. The CIT(A) 5. D.R., I.T.A.T., Lucknow

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →